I bought top of the line 2010 17'' Macbook Pro fully loaded with matte screen too. But of course some people just like to hate on things they can't afford. Just look at how many companies that were affected by Sony's shitty laptop batteries. It can be resolved in a short period through software or maybe the 2011 models will just be notorious for being rubbish and smart people will pass on them and wait for the next iteration where the issue may not exist.Īlternatively they could have had a bad batch of components. One thing Apple does do that many other companies don't is adapt new technologies sooner and as a result are more likely to get bit in the ass by something going wrong. It is just as likely that can cause problems even if you're not actually plugging anything into the port. People need to take a break from their anti-apple circle jerk and remember that the newest macbook features brand new technology in it like Intel's Thunderbolt. The hardware is quality and it's built in such a way that you end up with something that resembles what a laptop should be rather than some big ugly plastic thing that gives you back pains carrying it around. I don't think it's any surprise a lot of developers can be seen with Macbooks even if they aren't running OS X. Part of the reason for this is it seems to be nearly impossible to get an SSD in a laptop which seems retarded but you're looking at quite a big bump up in the price to add the equivalent sized SSD into a Wintel laptop.Īgain even if you do get all those things it will still be in a cheap plastic case, it will almost certainly still be thicker, run warmer and louder. But having gone through the process of pricing up laptops to get everything I have in my macbook it would cost nearly as much or more in some cases. THere are even small touches like being able to check the battery life without even turning it on. Despite being thinner things like the lid feel much sturdier than a Dell and it comes with everything. My macbook pro easily meets the 7 hour battery life they've claimed (mine is one version before the 2011), it's almost always nearly as cool as when it's off, it's dead silent, starts up and is at a functional desktop within 5 seconds and yes it looks better with it's metal case than some cheap plastic one and it's thinner than what I'd get from Dell. Who cares what some guy on Slashdot thinks? If I were a Windows geek I'd probably feel the same way about my friends buying Macs and expecting me to help when they melt down. I will admit that I get a little ticked off when my non-geek friends buy Windows machines and then expect me to help them when they melt down, but if you're willing to be responsible for the downsides of your choice, buy what *you* want. You aren't that person, and you might not make the same choice given the same constraints for a variety of reasons, but that doesn't mean that the person's choice was "bogus," or that their explanation is wrong. These aren't arguments-they're explanations for why the person making the explanation made the choice they made. My wife just got a 15", because she needs the extra screen real estate. I'd have to have a *really good reason* to spend the extra money for a 15" or 17"-not just to show off. I have a 13" MBP because I do not want the extra weight. And you buy the Mac that does what you need, if you buy a Mac. If you don't, you can buy whatever you want, Mac or non-Mac. "Argument?" "Bogus?" To whom? If you want a computer that runs MacOS, you buy a Mac. So the GP was exaggerating a bit but still there is a fairly steep premium for apple hardware and this is compounded by apple's very limited selection which means you often end up buying far more than you actually require. OTOH if you compare to the 15 inch vostro line (in PC laptops 15 inch models tend to be cheaper than equivilent 13 inch models) then things get cheaper still. If you compare to the 13 inch vostro 3300 with an i5-480M then a machine with similar specs (older processor family but higher clockspeed so probablly overall similar) is £559.00 plus VAT and shipping which will put the total arround £700. If you want a 15 inch machine with a quad core (there is no option for a 15 inch with a dual core or a 13 inch with a quad core that will set you back £1,549.00 inc VAT and shipping)Ĭomparing to dell it depends what you compare with. Unfortunately the model number wikipedia lists for the CPU doesn't seem to match up with anything on intels website but assuming the turbo is similar to the models that straddle it it would have a max turbo with all cores active arround 2.8 GHz. Note: since the GP quoted in pounds i'm using UK prices from both dell and apple.Ī £999 inc VAT and shipping (closest price in this list to £1000) macbook pro comes with a 13 inch screen and a 2.3GHz dual-core Intel Core i5.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |